Categories

# Solution Manual for Managerial Accounting 6 Edition by Hartgraves

Product Code: 222
Availability: In Stock
Price: \$24.99
Qty:     - OR -

## Description

Chapter 2
COST BEHAVIOR, ACTIVITY ANALYSIS, AND COST ESTIMATION
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
Q2-1. Variable, fixed, mixed, and step costs and their related total cost functions are described as follows:
Variable costs are uniform for each incremental unit of activity. Total variable costs change in direct proportion to changes in activity, equaling zero dollars when activity is zero and increasing at a constant amount per unit of activity.
Fixed costs are a constant amount per period of time. The fixed cost curve is flat with a slope of zero.
Mixed costs contain a fixed and a variable cost element. They are positive when activity is zero and increase in a linear fashion as activity increases.
Step costs are constant within a given range of activity but differ between ranges of activity. They increase in a step-like fashion as activity increases.
Q2-2. Because of the multitude of underlying factors that drive costs, presenting all costs of an organization as a function of a single independent variable is not accurate enough to make specific decisions concerning products, services, or activities.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 Solutions Manual, Chapter 2 2-1

Q2-3. The vertical axis intercept of the economists short-run total cost function represents capacity costs. Because of high marginal costs at low levels of activity, the initial slope is quite steep. In the normal activity range, where marginal costs are quite low, the slope becomes less steep. Then, because of high marginal costs above the normal activity range, the slope of the economists total cost function increases again. The range of operations within which a linear function is a reasonable approximation of total costs is called the relevant range.
Q2-4. Using the high-low method, the first step is to select representative observations for high and low activity levels. Next, variable costs per unit are found by dividing the difference in total costs by the difference in total activity. Once variable costs are determined, the fixed costs, which are identical in both periods, are computed by estimating the total variable costs of either the high or low activity period and subtracting them from the corresponding total costs.
Q2-5. Cost estimation concerns the determination of previous or current relationships between activity and cost, while cost prediction is the forecasting of future costs. Cost estimating equations, developed using past data, are frequently used for predicting future costs.
Q2-6. A scatter diagram helps in selecting high and low activity levels representative of normal operating conditions. It also can be used to determine if costs can be reasonably approximated by a straight line.
Q2-7. Least-squares regression analysis uses all available data, rather than just two observations. It can also provide standardized information on how well the cost estimating equation fits the historical cost data.
Q2-8. Matching activity and cost within a single observation is important because accuracy is reduced if activity is recorded in one time period and costs are recorded in another. This problem is most likely to exist with short time periods.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012
2-2 Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition

Q2-9. During the past century
Direct materials have increased slightly as a percentage of total
manufacturing costs.
Direct labor has decreased significantly as a percentage of total manufacturing costs.
Manufacturing overhead has increased significantly as a percentage of total manufacturing costs.
In the past, when manufacturing overhead was relatively small, it was possible to ignore overhead and assume that units of product or service were the primary cost driver. With the increase in manufacturing overhead, units of final product or service are no longer an adequate explanation of changes in manufacturing overhead.
Q2-10. In a manufacturing facility, unit-level activities are performed for each unit of product, batch-level activities are performed for each batch of product, product- level activities are performed to support the production of the product, and facility-level activities are performed to maintain general manufacturing capabilities.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 Solutions Manual, Chapter 2 2-3

MINI-EXERCISES
M2-11.
a. Fixed
b. Variable c. Fixed
d. Step
e. Variable
M2-12.
a. Fixed
b. Mixed c. Mixed d. Variable e. Step
M2-13.
a. 8 b. 8 c. 11 d. 1 e. 11
M2-14.
a.4 b.2 c.7 d. 5 e. 11
f. Mixed g. Variable h. Mixed
i. Variable j. Fixed
f. Variable g. Mixed h. Fixed
i. Variable j. Mixed
f. 8 g. 7 h. 5 i. 2 j. 3
f. 9 g. 6 h. 1 i. 7 j. 2
k. l. m. n. o.
k. l. m.
12 5 4 3 8
8 or 12 (Slope of total costs increases.) 3
10
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 2-4
Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition

EXERCISES
E2-15.
a.
Total Monthly Fixed Volume Costs
100 \$10,000 1,000 10,000 5,000 10,000
10,000 10,000
Total Variable Costs (Unit x \$0.40)
Total Average Monthly Unit Costs Cost
\$10,040 \$100.40 10,400 10.40 12,000 2.40 14,000 1.40
\$
40 400 2,000 4,000
b. Because the variable costs remain constant at \$0.40 per unit, an average cost of \$0.60 will occur when the average fixed cost is \$0.20 per unit. This will occur at 50,000 servings per month:
\$10,000/\$0.20 = 50,000 servings per month
E2-16.
a.
Units 20,000 50,000
Current Process
Variable Costs (\$0.20/unit)
\$ 4,000 10,000
Proposed Process
Fixed
Costs \$5,000 5,000
Total Costs \$ 9,000
15,000
Fixed
Costs \$10,000 10,000
Variable Costs (\$0.20/unit)
\$ 800 2,000
Total Costs \$10,800
12,000
b. It is apparent from the solution to (a) and the difference in cost structures that the proposed process costs less at higher volumes, while the current process costs less at lower volumes. If the cost functions are set equal to each other to find the volume at which they yield identical costs, we can determine that the automatic process is preferred above this volume.
Cost of current process
\$5,000 + \$0.20X
\$0.16X X
= =
= = =
Cost of automatic process \$10,000 + \$0.04X
\$5,000 \$5,000/\$0.16 31,250
31,250 prints, the proposed process is preferred.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 2-5
Beyond a monthly volume of
Solutions Manual, Chapter 2

E2-17.
a.
Student help
Collating machine
Fixed Variable Costs Costs** \$1,550 \$25
2,400
*\$8.00 per hour/5,000 copies per hour = \$0.0016 per copy
Fixed Units Costs
Variable Costs* \$800 2,400
Total Costs \$800
Total Costs
\$1,575 4,625
500,000 \$0 1,500,000 0
1,550 75 **\$0.05 per 1,000 copies/1,000 copies = \$0.00005 per copy
b. It is apparent from the solution to (a) and the difference in cost structures that the collating machine costs less at higher volumes, while the student help costs less at lower volumes. If the cost functions are set equal to each other to find the volume at which they yield identical costs, we can determine that the collating machine process is preferred above this volume.
Cost of student help = \$0.0016X = \$0.00155X =
X
Beyond a monthly volume of 1,000,000 copies, the collating machine is preferred.
Cost of collating machine \$1,550 + \$0.00005X
\$1,550
\$1,550/\$0.00155
=
= 1,000,000
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012
2-6 Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition

E2-18.
Variable costs
Fixed costs or
Total annual costs where:
E2-19.
a. Variable costs =
= \$12 per sales order
Fixed costs =
= =
= =
=
(\$209,000 \$177,000)/(684,000 556,000) \$0.25 per mile
\$209,000 \$0.25(684,000) \$38,000
\$177,000 \$0.25(556,000) \$38,000
= \$38,000 + \$0.25X X = annual fleet miles
(\$52,000 \$16,000)/(4,000 1,000) \$52,000 \$12(4,000)
or
= \$4,000
= \$16,000 \$12(1,000) \$4,000
Monthly order = processing costs
where:X = sales orders continued next page
\$4,000 + \$12X
Solutions Manual, Chapter 2
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 2-7

E2-19. continued b.
\$60,000
\$50,000 Total order \$40,000
processing \$30,000
costs \$20,000 \$10,000 \$0
Representative values
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Sales orders
= (\$32,000 16,000)/(3,000 1,000)
= \$8 per sales order
= \$32,000 \$8(3,000)
= \$8,000
= \$16,000 \$8(1,000) \$8,000
= \$8,000 + \$8X where X = sales orders
c. The equation used in (a) is influenced by the unusually high costs incurred at a volume of 4,000 sales orders. This volume may require the payment of overtime and cause inefficiencies resulting from operating beyond the capacity for which facilities were designed.
The effect of basing a cost estimating equation on this observation is to overstate the variable costs and to understate the fixed costs.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012
2-8 Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition
Variable costs
Fixed costs or
Monthly order processing costs

E2-20.
a. Variable costs Fixed costs
or
b.
= (\$9,000 \$4,800)/(400 100) = \$14 per mile
= \$9,000 \$14(400) = \$3,400 = \$4,800 \$14(100) = \$3,400
= \$3,400 + \$14X where: X = miles mowed and cleaned
Monthly labor costs
\$10,000 \$8,000 Totallabor \$6,000 \$4,000 \$2,000 \$0
Representative values
100 200 300 400 500 Miles mowed & cleaned
cost
Variable costs =
= \$20 per mile
0
(\$9,000 \$5,000)/(400 200) \$9,000 \$20(400) = \$1,000
\$5,000 \$20(200) = \$1.000 \$1,000 + \$20X
Fixed costs = or =
Monthly labor = costs
where: X = miles mowed and cleaned continued next page
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 Solutions Manual, Chapter 2 2-9

E2-20. continued
c. The equation used in (a) is influenced by the unusually high costs incurred in
October when only 100 miles were mowed and cleaned. The October activity is low, perhaps due to the reduced growth of grass and less highway litter after the end of the summer vacation season. Employees may have had extra time and may have paced their work to fill the available time. The effect of including the October observation in the high-low cost estimate is to understate the variable costs and to overstate the fixed costs.
The effect of basing a cost-estimating equation on this observation is to overstate the variable costs and to understate the fixed costs.
d. The effect of a 7 percent wage increase is to increase the amount of each cost element by 7 percent.
Total costs = \$1,070 + \$21.40X
E2-21.
a. Fixed costs are easily identified. They are the same at each activity level. Variable and mixed costs can be determined by dividing total costs by monthly sales at two activity levels. The quotients of variable costs will be the same at both levels. The quotients of mixed costs will be lower at the higher activity level. This is because the fixed costs are spread over a larger number of units.
Cost
Cost of food sold
Wages and fringe benefits Fees paid delivery help
Rent on building
Depreciation on equipment Utilities
Supplies (soap, floor wax, etc.) Administrative costs
continued next page
Behavior
Variable Mixed Variable Fixed Fixed Mixed Mixed Fixed
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 2-10
Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition

E2-21.
b.
V M
V F F M
M
F
continued
Cost of food sold (\$10,000/5,000) Wagesandfringebenefits:
[(\$4,500 \$4,250)/(10,000 5,000)] [\$4,500 (\$0.05 10,000)]
Fees paid delivery help (\$1,250/5,000) Rent on building
Depreciation on equipment
Utilities:
[(\$600 \$500)/(10,000 5,000)] [\$600 (\$0.02 10,000)] Supplies:
[(\$200 \$150)/(10,000 5,000)] [\$200 (\$0.01 10,000) Administrative costs
Total costs equation
Fixed Costs
\$4,000
0.25X 1,200
600
0.02X 400
0.01X 100
1,300 \$7,600
______ \$2.33X
Variable Costs
\$2.00X 0.05X
Where:
X = unit sales
Note: The computations can be performed at other activity levels. c. Totalcosts=\$7,600+\$2.33(9,500)=\$29,735
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 Solutions Manual, Chapter 2 2-11

E2-22.
a.
Units
500 4,000
Average Total Costs Costs
\$21.00 \$10,500 7.00 28,000
Variable costs = (\$28,000 \$10,500)/(4,000 500) = \$5 per dog-day
Fixed costs = \$28,000 \$5(4,000) or = \$10,500 \$5(500)
Total cost = \$8,000 + \$5X where:
X = dog-days per month
= \$8,000 per month = \$8,000 per month
b. Fixed costs (\$8,000 12) Variable costs (\$5 24,000) Total costs
Dog-days
Average cost per dog-day
\$ 96,000 120,000 \$216,000 24,000 \$ 9.00
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 2-12
Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition

E2-23.
a.
\$500,000
\$400,000 Mfg. \$300,000 Costs \$200,000 \$100,000 \$0
\$500,000
\$400,000 Mfg. \$300,000 Costs \$200,000 \$100,000 \$0
0 50000 100000 Units Sold
150000
0
20000 40000 60000 80000 1E+05 1E+05 Units Manufactured
Manufacturing costs appear to have a higher correlation with units manufactured than with units sold. This conclusion is based on a visual inspection of the scatter diagrams. Using correlation as a criterion, units manufactured is the better predictor of manufacturing costs.
Note: The instructor may ask the student to compute the coefficients of determination between each independent variable and manufacturing costs as an optional assignment. The coefficient between manufacturing costs and units manufactured is 0.939, and the coefficient between manufacturing costs and units sold is 0.629.
continued next page
Solutions Manual, Chapter 2 2-13
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012

E2-23. continued
b. Units are often produced in periods before the one in which they are sold.
Because manufacturing costs are incurred in connection with the manufacture rather than the sale of products, it seems reasonable to expect that manufacturing costs will also have a higher correlation with units produced than they will with units sold.
c. Because selling costs are incurred in connection with selling rather than manufacturing activities, unit sales should be the better predictor of selling costs.
E2-24.
a. R-squaredvaluesbetweenpossibleindependentvariablesandshipping expenses are as follows:
Units shipped Weight shipped Sales value
0.924 0.606 0.214
Based on the coefficient of determination, units shipped has the closest relationship with shipping expenses.
b. Shippingexpenses=\$2,247.35+\$1.12X where:
X = units shipped
c. Shipping expenses = \$2,247.35 + (\$1.12 x 5,000)
= \$7,847.35
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012
2-14 Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition

PROBLEMS
P2-25.
a. Trumpetscostestimationequation:
b = (\$28,800 \$19,200)/(8,000 2,000) = \$1.60 a = \$28,800 (8,000 \$1.60) = \$16,000
Y = \$16,000 + \$1.60(sales in dozens)
b. Plot of equations and observations:
A review of the scatter diagram, indicates the April unit volume is not representative. Revising the cost-estimating equation with the more representative January and March volumes:
b = (\$28,800 \$20,400)/(8,000 4,500) = \$2.40 a = \$28,800 (8,000 \$2.40) = \$9,600
Y = \$9,600 + \$2.40(sales in dozens)
continued next page
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 Solutions Manual, Chapter 2 2-15
Representative low observation
Representative high observation

P2-25. continued
c.
d.
e.
Which is a better predictor of future costs? Why?
The representative values identified with the aid of a scatter diagram provide a better cost-estimating equation and better predictor of future costs. This is because it omits the outlier observation at a volume of 2,000 units.
If you decided to develop a cost-estimating equation using the method of least squares, should you include all the observations? Why or why not?
No. The observation for 2,000 units should be omitted because it does not appear representative of normal operating conditions.
Reasons why the least-squares method is superior to the high-low and scatter diagram methods of cost estimation include.
It is objective.
It provides a measure of how well the cost-estimating equation explains the
variation in the dependent variable.
P2-26.
a. Rate per machine hour = (\$500,000 + \$100,000 + \$200,000)/20,000 hours = \$40 per machine hour
Predicted manufacturing overhead to produce 8,000 units of X1: (\$40 2,000 machine hours) = \$80,000
b. Unit-level rate per machine hour = \$500,000/20,000 hours = Batch-level rate per order = \$100,000/1,000 orders = Product-level rate per product = \$200,000/50 products = \$4,000/product
\$25/hour \$100/order
Predicted manufacturing overhead to produce 8,000 units of X1 using cost
hierarchy:
Unit-level costs (\$25 2,000 hours) Batch-level costs (\$100 10 orders) Product-level costs
Total
continued next page
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 2-16
\$50,000 1,000 4,000 \$55,000
Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition

P2-26. continued
c. Predicted X1 manufacturing overhead based on machine hours
Predicted X1 manufacturing overhead using cost hierarchy Over-prediction of X1 manufacturing overhead costs
with use of machine hours
d. Batch-level rate per machine hour = \$100,000/20,000 hours = \$5 per machine hour
Batch-level costs predicted using machine hours (\$5 2,000)
Batch-level costs predicted using orders (\$100 10 orders)
Over-prediction of X1 batch-level costs with use of machine hours
\$80,000 55,000
\$25,000
\$10,000 1,000 \$ 9,000
e. Product-level rate per machine hour = \$200,000/20,000 machine hours = \$10 per machine hour
Product-level costs predicted using machine hours (\$10 2,000) Product-level costs predicted using
rate per product
Over-prediction of X1 product-level costs
with use of machine hours
\$20,000 4,000 \$16,000
Solutions Manual, Chapter 2
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 2-17

P2-27.
a. Chicken(10bagsx\$3/bag) Wages (2 hours x \$8/hour) Fresh oil
Total batch cost
\$30.00 16.00 5.00 \$51.00
b. Batch cost (3 batches x \$51.00/batch) = \$153.00 Unit cost (\$153/300 units) = \$ 0.51
c. 4batches*x\$51.00/batch=\$204.00
*With a batch size of 100 units four batches are required to obtain 350 pieces.
d. Itwillincrease\$2.00perhour2hours=\$4.00
e. Chicken(5bags\$3/bag) \$15.00 Wages (1 hour \$8/hour) 8.00 Fresh oil 5.00 Total batch cost \$28.00
350 pieces/50 pieces per batch = 7 batches Total cost = (7 batches \$28) = \$196.00
P2-28.
Management should reduce the batch size to 50 because the costs incurred would decrease since the reduced batch size enables the exact number of pieces of chicken needed to be prepared with no waste. When the batch size is 100 pieces, 400 pieces must be prepared to get 350 pieces. Management should also consider quality issues. If the oil is replaced frequently, the taste of chicken may be better. Hence, producing 50-piece batches may result in both lower cost and better quality. Management should also be sure to follow Health Department regulations.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012
2-18 Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition

MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS
MA2-29.
The negative fixed costs were obtained by fitting a cost estimating line through observed data. The negative fixed costs are better viewed as a constant term. The true cost function changes in some unknown way beyond the range of observations. Even though the constant term is negative, it may still be used to predict costs within the relevant range.
MA2-30.
Mr. Morriss reaction may be appropriate in this case. Apparently the assistant engaged in a random search for a high R-squared, testing relationships that had no logical relationship. If enough random relationships are tested, the laws of probability indicate that, sooner or later, a high R-squared will be found. Relationships determined in this way are merely hypotheses and they should be verified on a second set of independent data.
Ultimately, it may be determined that pounds of scrap has a high R-squared with manufacturing overhead, but it does not seem to be a feasible basis for predicting manufacturing overhead. In order to do this, it would be necessary to predict scrap. This would cause predictions of overhead to be two steps removed from their cause production.
MA2-31.
a. Repairs and maintenance take place during periods of low production, perhaps because they are deferred until time is available or because the existence of a breakdown, requiring repairs, halts production.
Think of miles driven and maintenance costs on an automobile. A car cannot be driven as much on the day it is in the garage being repaired.
b. Weekly or monthly data might provide a better match of the relationship between production and repair costs. Production personnel might be asked how frequently machines need repairs under normal operating conditions. If it is weekly, then weekly data might be used.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 Solutions Manual, Chapter 2 2-19

MA2-32.
Mike is in a difficult situation. There is a strong temptation to keep quiet and hope there is no problem. Perhaps the excess oil consumption was a random event. There is also a temptation to want to avoid detecting a pollution problem. If there is pollution, it might not be detected when X-Town is demolished and paved over; and if pollution is detected then, Mike will be in another position. If questioned at that later date, he could claim ignorance.
On the other hand, if there is a pollution problem that continues for a couple more years, the cost of cleanup will be much higher than if the problem is corrected immediately. The increased awareness of the dangers of ground water pollution and the corresponding increase in regulations make it very unlikely that an oil tank leakage problem will go detected. Hence, correcting the problem today will likely be significantly less expensive than correcting it at some future date when more oil has leaked and the leaked oil has traveled further.
No information is provided about the ethical climate set by top management. Mike would feel much more comfortable informing top management of the situation and making an appropriate recommendation if he believed top management wanted to do the right thing. On the other hand, if top management treated the bearers of bad news as whistle-blowers, he has some difficult decisions to make.
If Phoenix Management Company has a code of ethics, Mike should consult it. If a code is not available for Phoenix, he might consult the code for another business or professional organization.
The appropriate sequence of actions is outlined under the heading Resolution of Ethical Conflict. In this case, Mike should start by discussing the problem with his immediate supervisor. He should explain the situation, outline the financial aspects of the alternative actions, and point out the advantage of developing a reputation as a good corporate citizen, concerned about the environment. Such a reputation will make the development of shopping malls in new communities easier.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012
2-20 Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition

MA2-33.
a. Therelevantmajorassumptionthatlimitstheaccuracyofthecurrentcost estimating equation is that the volume of activity is the only cost driver.
b. Incorporatingthehierarchyofactivitycostsintothecostestimatingequationwill improve the accuracy of cost predictions. The current equation erroneously assumes that all varieties of ice cream cost the same to produce, that all packaging costs vary with gallons, and that all distribution activities vary with gallons. Recognizing the variability in each of these cost elements improves accuracy.
c. Ageneralformofamoreaccuratecost-estimatingequationisasfollows:
Y = b1iX1i + b2iX2i + b3iX3i + b4iX4i + b5 iX5i Labels, descriptions, and examples of elements are:
Y = total costs per month
b1i, b2i, b3, b4i, b5i = cost per unit of cost driver
X1i = unit-level driver, where the subscript i refers to a specific driver, such as pounds of raw materials
X2i = batch-level driver, where the subscript i refers to a specific driver, such as batch inspection
X3i = product-level driver, where the subscript i refers to a specific driver, such as maintaining a supplier for special ingredients, perhaps almonds
X4i = customer driver, where the subscript i refers to a specific driver, such as packaging or advertising
X5 = facility-level drivers, where the subscript i refers to a specific driver, such as property taxes
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 Solutions Manual, Chapter 2 2-21

MA2-34.
Regression Output:
Constant -3967.575
Std Err of Y EST
R Squared
No. of Observations Degrees of Freedom X Coefficient(s)
Std Err of Coef.
56.775 9.462
517.696 0.978 12 7
64.266 52.987 101.016 9.835 6.184 7.699
The resulting cost estimation equation and the cost per unit of each service is as follows:
Y = \$3,967.58 + \$56.78(X1) + \$64.27(X2) + \$52.99(X3) + \$101.02(X4) This equation explains 97.8 percent of the variation in total monthly costs.
b. A comparison of the proposed rates and the estimated variable costs is presented below:
Procedure Proposed rate Est. cost Profit (loss)
X1 X2 \$45.00 \$90.00 56.78 64.27
\$(11.78) \$25.73
X3 \$60.00 52.99 \$ 7.01
X4 \$105.00 101.02 \$ 3.98
The desirability of the proposal depends on the mix of services used by the employees of the local business. If the mix contained a significant portion of X1, the proposal might not be desirable. Perhaps the best recommendation is to negotiate on the rate for procedure X1 to make sure that service is profitable. Central City might even offer to reduce the rate on procedure X2 to obtain an increase in the rate for X1.
c. Accordingtothegiveninformation,theproposedratesaresignificantlybelowthe current rates. Hence, accepting the proposal would require turning away regular customers who pay more for the identical services. This is not logical. Central City should reject the proposal.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012
2-22 Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition

MA2-35.
a. ThehighobservationisApril2011andthelowobservationisDecember2011. Slope = (\$97,800 \$37,650)/(315 165) = \$60,150/150 = \$401
Vertical axis intercept = \$97,800 (\$401 315) = (\$28,515)
or
Vertical axis intercept = \$37,650 (\$401 165) = (\$28,515) Cost estimating equation: Y = (\$28,515) + \$401X
The negative \$28,515 does not represent what costs would be at a production level of zero. Rather this is merely a value that assists in fitting an equation through the high and low observations. Because the high-low method utilizes two unusual observations (highest and lowest activity) it is possible that an equation developed with the high-low method does not represent the actual cost behavior pattern. The scatter graph, developed below, assists in evaluating the high and low observations and selecting representative high and low observations.
b. The scatter diagram is as follows:
It appears the April 2011 observation is not representative of normal operating conditions and should be excluded from an analysis of costs under normal operating conditions.
continued next page
Solutions Manual, Chapter 2 2-23
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012

MA2-35. continued
c. ThehighobservationisnowAugust2010whilethelowobservationremains
December 2011
Slope = (\$60,630 \$37,650)/(285 165) = \$22,980/120 = \$191.50 Vertical axis intercept = \$60,630 (\$191.50 285) = \$6,052.50
or
Vertical axis intercept = \$37,650 (\$191.50 165) = \$6,052.50 Cost estimating equation: Y = \$6,052.50 + \$191.50X
The results are strikingly different from those obtained in part a. The vertical axis intercept is much higher, and a positive number, while the slope is smaller. Basically, the unusual high observation in part a pulled the high end of the equation up from what it should be.
d. Presented is a partial printout from an Excel spreadsheet, excluding the April 2011 observation, with items of interest highlighted in bold:
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R
R Square
Square
Standard Error
Observations 18
0.826789
0.68358
0.663804 4049.279
Intercept
X Variable 1
continued next page
Standard
Coefficients Error t Stat P-value
14001.1 6268.23112 2.233661 0.040133 158.3602 26.93540398 5.879258 2.33E-05
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012
2-24 Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition

MA2-35. d. continued
A consideration of the data not presented in bold, although important in applications of regression analysis, is beyond the scope of this text where we focus on how cost data can be analyzed using regression analysis.
The cost estimating equation is:
Cost estimating equation: Y = \$14,001.10 + \$158.36X
This equation has two advantages over that developed in part c.
It uses all observations (except April 2011), rather than just two
representative observations.
It provides information on how well the cost-estimating equation explains the
variation in the dependent variable. In this case, the cost-estimating equation explains 68.358 percent of the variation in total manufacturing costs.
Because of the least-squares criteria, the analyst must evaluate the data used in regression analysis and exclude unusual observations. Otherwise, a single large squared deviation will have a disproportionate influence in the cost-estimating equation.
continued next page
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 Solutions Manual, Chapter 2 2-25

MA2-35. continued
e. Thekeytosolvingrequirementeistorecognizethatallpreviousanalysisfailed
to determine the separate influence of dining room table and kitchen tables on manufacturing costs. The offer of \$220 per table is above the computations of the variable cost per table in parts c (\$191.50) and d (\$158.36). Hence, management might be tempted to accept the offer.
Using multiple regression analysis with two independent variables, rather than one, illustrates this would be a mistake. Presented is a partial printout from an Excel spreadsheet with two independent variables, with items of interest highlighted in bold:
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R
R Square
Standard Error
Observations 18
0.998593
0.997187
0.996812
394.3038
ANOVA
Regression 2
Residual 15
Total 17 829108153
Significance df SS MS F F
826776021
233213225
4.13E+08 155476
2658.86
7.389E-20
Standard
Coefficients Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% 95%
Upper
Intercept 7888.485 X Variable 1 295.996 X Variable 2 120.5055
628.412302 4.26693951 2.78141943
12.5530 69.3696 43.3252
2.33E-09 3.16E-20 3.56E-17
6549.0557 286.90125 114.57701
9227.91 305.091 126.434
Variable 1 represents the variable cost of a dining room table while variable 2 represents the variable cost of a kitchen table. Hence, the variable cost of a dining room table, \$295.996, exceeds the offer of \$220 per table. Management should reject the offer.
If students do not have access to a computer and spreadsheet software, the instructor can assign the problem and provide the results of the regression.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012
2-26 Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition

MA2-36.
If students do not have access to a computer and spreadsheet software, the instructor can still assign the problem after providing them with the following output:
First, for simple regression analysis:
Regression Output: Constant
Std Err of Y Est
R Squared
No. of Observations Degrees of Freedom
X Coefficient Std Err of Coef.
26.82222 2.994439 0.481696
10 8
Second, for multiple regression analysis:
Regression Output: Constant
Std Err of Y Est
R Squared
No. of Observations Degrees of Freedom
X Coefficient Std Err of Coef.
continued next page
1.258166 0.09271
9.646175 0.66333 0.980925
10 6
2.464264 0.175571
2.600728 0.14941
1.111111 0.407492
Solutions Manual, Chapter 2
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 2-27

MA2-36. continued
1. An important part of determining what Kevin should do is to determine how long
it takes to recondition a desktop computer.
Based on total unit and total hour information for the past 10 weeks, the average time to repair a piece of electronic equipment is 2.7875 hours (446 total hours/160 total units).
This suggests he can recondition approximately 14 desktop computers per week (40 hours per week/2.7875 hours) to obtain total weekly revenues of \$560 (14 computers \$40 each) and monthly revenues of \$2,240 (\$560 4 weeks). Subtracting the rental fee of \$200 leaves him with \$2,040 to cover other costs such as extra utilities and wages.
If he worked for the store, he would receive \$1,760 per month (\$11 40 hours 4 weeks).
Based on this analysis, there is a monthly advantage of \$280 to accepting the contract.
One problem with this analysis is that it assumes that all pieces of electronic equipment require the same amount of time to recondition. It also assumes that all 40 hours are devoted to direct labor activities. It is likely that there are facility- level activities such as equipment maintenance, training, and paperwork.
continued next page
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012
2-28 Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition

MA2-36. continued
2. Based on simple regression analysis, 26.822 facility-level hours are required
each week. This leaves 13.178 (40 26.822) hours to work on computers. Simple regression analysis indicates that the marginal time to repair a piece of electronic equipment is 1.111 hours. Using the available time, approximately 12 (13.178/1.111) computers can be reconditioned each week to obtain total weekly revenues of \$480 (12 computers \$40 each) and monthly revenues of \$1,920 (\$480 4 weeks). Subtracting the rental fee of \$200 leaves him with \$1,720 to cover other costs such as extra utilities and wages.
If Kevin worked for the store, he would receive \$1,760 per month.
Based on this analysis there is a monthly advantage of \$40 for working for Radio Stuff.
While the simple regression approach recognizes the existence of facility-level activities, it also assumes that all pieces of electronic equipment require the same amount of time to recondition.
An advantage of the regression approach is that we are provided with information on the goodness of fit. In this case the fit is not good. The coefficient of determination for the simple regression analysis is 0.481696, indicating that only 48.17% of the variation in total weekly hours is explained by the estimating equation. Hence, not much trust can be placed in these results.
continued next page
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012 Solutions Manual, Chapter 2 2-29

MA2-36. continued
3. Based on multiple regression analysis, 9.646 facility-level hours are required
each week. This leaves 30.354 (40 9.646) hours to work on computers. Multiple regression analysis also indicates that the marginal time to repair a computer is 2.6 hours. Using the available time, approximately 12 (30.354 2.6) computers can be reconditioned each week to obtain total weekly revenues of \$480 (12 computers \$40 each) and monthly revenues of \$1,920 (\$480 4 weeks). Subtracting the rental fee of \$200 leaves her with \$1,720 to cover other costs such as extra utilities and wages.
If Kevin worked for the store he would receive \$1,760 per month.
Based on this analysis there is a monthly advantage of \$40 for working for Radio Stuff.
In this case, R-squared is 0.980925, implying that 98.09 percent of the variation in the dependent variable is explained by the cost-estimating equation.
Because of the small monthly advantage of working for Radio Stuff other considerations will likely be important in making a decision. Additional considerations include:
If Kevin can reduce the facility-level hours for setup and administrative activities and recondition 3 or 4 more computers, the economics would suggest accepting the contract.
Kevin may find that by reducing his travel time to and from work he is able to devote additional time to reconditioning computers. This might change the economics of accepting the contract.
There are quality-of-work issues. Working at home, Kevin can set his own hours. On the other hand, having a regular job provides some social interaction and clearly separates work from non-work activities.
Working at home requires a higher level of self-motivation than going to a more traditional job.
Fringe benefits are not mentioned in the case. If the store provides fringe benefits, such as health care and retirement benefits, the economics would clearly favor not accepting the contract.
Travel costs are not mentioned in the case. If they are high, this would favor working at home.
Note: To avoid complexities related to self-employment taxes they are not considered in this assignment. Some students might mention self-employment taxes as an additional consideration.
Cambridge Business Publishers, 2012
2-30 Managerial Accounting, 6th Edition

## Write a review

Your Review: Note: HTML is not translated!